🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide so closely with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure version of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. While he is called Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged him to take the job. The presidency was effectively a casting call with many contenders. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by the actor's debut as James Bond. His harder interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his surfaced on city centers, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to examine.