🔗 Share this article

Turns out Ruben Amorim was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding System & Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who will adapt their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin them for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.